Re: [privacy] U.S. House Vote on 'Illegal Images' Sweeps in WiFi,

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On Dec 17, 2007 10:21 AM, Brian Loe <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 6:32 AM, Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > > Child sex, and sexual abuse in general, are not normal for a reason.
> > > They don't have anything to do with a "sex" drive - to begin with.
> >
> > I was just guessing on this one :-) It still confounds me why anyone
> > would do this, maybe being abused as a child themselves? Then you get
> > into the chicken-and-the-egg argument.. I just think that you have to
> > fight the cause, not the effect, as history has taught us.
>
> I would prefer to fight the cause as well - if one could be found that
> didn't begin and end with the perp. This type of behaviour is almost
> certainly to do with brain damage (meaning chemical imbalances, etc.).
> But "treatment" of this would not console me, as a parent, in the
> least. Either we "fix" them permanently or "treat" them at arms
> length, through rubber rooms. I would support early detection of such
> problems as well, if it were possible and 100% accurate.
>
> Anything less than 100% accuracy, however, I would be solidly against. :)


Either "fix" the issue, or what chemical castration? I guess that
wouldn't work if this wasn't a sex-drive, but a mental issue..

Which is more humane: Locking up someone forever because you cant fix
their issue, or putting them to death? I would rather be killed than
spend a lifetime in an asylum..,.

-JP
_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy