funsec mailing list archives
Re: too beautiful not to share
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 13:44:57 -0400
On 10/5/07, Brian Loe <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:
On 10/5/07, Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:So, we sold Saddam "destructions"? What kind of destructions did we sell him?Sorry, I am a dumb ass, I mean W's :-)Okay, with that cleared up, do you also need the difference between a standard weapon and a weapon of MASS DESTRUCTION explained to you? A death at a time or thousands...in case you do.
Bin Laden didnt need WMD's, just some training, money, and 4 box cutters. Saddam didnt need WMD's to kill lots o' people. As for the WMD's, I think we may have sold some to Saddam (ricin? or some such) but I am not up to date on the political BS du jour. -JP _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: too beautiful not to share, (continued)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Dude VanWinkle (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Brian Loe (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Brian Loe (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Brian Loe (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Blue Boar (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Andy Sutton (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Brian Loe (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Dude VanWinkle (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Dennis Henderson (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Drsolly (Oct 05)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Don Blumenthal (Oct 04)
- Re: too beautiful not to share rms (Oct 04)
- Re: too beautiful not to share Brian Loe (Oct 04)