funsec mailing list archives
Re: U.S. Army: Wikis Too Risky
From: "Joel R. Helgeson" <joel () helgeson com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:57:13 -0600
You dismiss the military all too quickly. It is the fomentation of sixth generation warfare that is countering these insurgen groups online. One military commander needs to oversee one AO (area of operations). These warriors fight using real bullets with real consequences. There is an entire shift taking place throughout the entire military-industrial complex to embrace 4th-5th-and 6th gen war. Oh yes, we are good at it, far better than they are. Only our networks are classified operations that the enemy can't see, whereas we can read their blogs with impunity. You cannot imagine what all the military is doing. Oh yes, they've caught on quick. For more on 4th-Nth generation warfare, check out TDAXP blog. Joel -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Paul Ferguson Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 2:02 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: [funsec] U.S. Army: Wikis Too Risky -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Via Danger Room. [snip] They might not build $150-million F-22 stealth fighters, but in other ways insurgents and terrorists are amazingly tech savvy. For one, they're hip to using grungy, bare-bones websites to spread tactics and ideology across the planet on the cheap, transforming once-isolated local and regional conflicts into genuine threats to global stability. Author John Robb calls this "open-source warfare," and believes it's the most important force shaping the 21st century. If so, we're screwed. Seven years after the launch of Wikipedia -- the user-edited online encyclopedia that brought the "open source" concept to the masses -- the U.S. Army is still playing catch-up. The Army's idea of harnessing the 'net is to launch isolated websites, put generals in charge and lock everything behind passwords, while banning popular open-source civilian websites. Colonel James Galvin, head of the Army's "Battle Command Knowledge System," openly admits that when it comes to the collaborative internet, the bad guys have a "niche advantage." [snip] More: http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/02/army-wikis-too.html Interesting article. - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHueQ2q1pz9mNUZTMRAtguAJ44Ul529KYdCCEsEovobQQIjtexYgCffQHZ gOJT9CT6ZwuNOZOQmUQOTqc= =wgSu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- U.S. Army: Wikis Too Risky Paul Ferguson (Feb 18)
- Re: U.S. Army: Wikis Too Risky Joel R. Helgeson (Feb 18)
- Re: U.S. Army: Wikis Too Risky John C. A. Bambenek, CISSP (Feb 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: U.S. Army: Wikis Too Risky Paul Ferguson (Feb 18)