Re: House Armed Services Committee discussion on EMP

[Martin Tomasek <tomasek () ufe cz>]

Kevin McAleavey wrote:
>  You guys might find this article, pulished in Popular Mechanics in September of 2001 "interesting" ...
>
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1281421.html?page=1
>
>  Doesn't require a nuke at all ...

Plans for an old model of EM bomb was published few years ago. The only 
part missing is description of antenna. There are special requirements 
for antennae, for example no polarisation and wideband range.

If you are interested in protection from HEMP, look here:
http://cryptome.org/emp.htm

-- 
Martin Tomasek


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.