funsec mailing list archives
Re: So ze Q-bomb wuz a dud? :)
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:20:38 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:50:09 PDT, "Paul M. Moriarty" said:20M machines. So there will still be > 13M compromised boxes post-hype.The important point is that all of them are essentially Good To Go. ;)
An easy way for Windows users to find out whether they might be infected, or not: http://www.confickerworkinggroup.org/infection_test/cfeyechart.html Thanks to Joe Stewart for his efforts. :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wj8DBQFJ1ATMq1pz9mNUZTMRAvDLAJ9conno1YG10tJMqWXCmla4vQ6q/gCghwUe Y2Fp3QRFfQ0sLPYqdTqXXW4= =ZFdZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- So ze Q-bomb wuz a dud? :) Kevin McAleavey (Apr 01)
- Re: So ze Q-bomb wuz a dud? :) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 01)
- Re: So ze Q-bomb wuz a dud? :) Paul M. Moriarty (Apr 01)
- Re: So ze Q-bomb wuz a dud? :) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 01)
- Re: So ze Q-bomb wuz a dud? :) Paul Ferguson (Apr 01)
- Re: So ze Q-bomb wuz a dud? :) Paul M. Moriarty (Apr 01)
- Re: So ze Q-bomb wuz a dud? :) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 01)
- Re: So ze Q-bomb wuz a dud? :) Blanchard_Michael (Apr 01)