Re: Conficker business productivity loss

["David Harley" <david.a.harley () gmail com>]

:-D

I could get into a lot of trouble by commenting any further...

--
David Harley BA CISSP FBCS CITP
Small Blue-Green World

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org 
> [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Nick FitzGerald
> Sent: 02 April 2009 07:13
> To: 'funsec'
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Conficker business productivity loss
>
> Valdis Kletnieks to me:
>
> > > That's a productivity gain for a writer, isn't it?   8-)
> >
> > You know how *hard* it is to write so that the average 
> semi-literate, 
> > mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging, evolutionary throwback ...
>
> You mean "Americans"?
>
> > ... can understand?
>
> Even writing so the media understands would be a start!  (And 
> yes, that's a dig at the media, not David -- see the following.)
>
> > Oh, he should write for intelligent, literate types?  He 
> did that 3 months ago.
>
> Actually, I think he does that most of the time...
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick FitzGerald
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>  
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of 
> virus signature database 3982 (20090402) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>  

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.