funsec mailing list archives
Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my!
From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:53:14 -0800
The PI license requirement in MI is universal, applying to any forensic examination. AFAIK NC has the same legislation pending. So, it does apply to private industry, as it will to any federal prime or sub contractor (which, AFAIK, includes Trend). Given that government contracting is the only growth industry out there right now, the "do business with the feds" requirement pretty much makes it a must have for anyone who really wants to work in the field. Once again, not in favor, just predicting. I, for one, am finally going to go waste billable hours getting certs (something I can ill afford to do). -----Original Message----- From: Paul Ferguson [mailto:fergdawgster () gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:48 PM To: Tomas L. Byrnes Cc: Hubbard, Dan; Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu; funsec; RandallM Subject: Re: [funsec] threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <tomb () byrneit net> wrote:
I never said it was a good idea. I merely predicted it would come to pass.
Right -- and I said that it does not apply to private industry which is arguably where most of the top-notch cyber security talent is anyway,so it is a Red Herring of the highest order. :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wj8DBQFLPALQq1pz9mNUZTMRAgR/AJ97atY4fJQ3XG7EUBLCGvKksPhJ9gCeJ+gd MHlzjCwivMlFZkzdSCVMpj4= =CnzM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! RandallM (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Hubbard, Dan (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Paul Ferguson (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Paul Ferguson (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Paul Ferguson (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Paul Ferguson (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 30)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Joel Esler (Dec 31)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! David Lodge (Dec 31)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! G. D. Fuego (Dec 31)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! The Security Community (Dec 31)
- Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 31)