funsec mailing list archives
Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?]
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:10:52 +0200
der Mouse wrote:
I'd argue with your "very nice guy" a little even for OS X, though, since there is a substantial amount of Unix basing in the libc layer, which is used by much more than just the CLI; of the three components listed, it would have to be part of the core.
What percentage of the core would you consider to be open source? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] der Mouse (Oct 01)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] Gadi Evron (Oct 01)
- Message not available
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] der Mouse (Oct 02)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] Gadi Evron (Oct 02)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 02)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] Gadi Evron (Oct 03)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] der Mouse (Oct 02)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] Gadi Evron (Oct 03)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] der Mouse (Oct 03)
- Message not available
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] Paul M Moriarty (Oct 03)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] Paul Vixie (Oct 04)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] der Mouse (Oct 04)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] Joel Esler (Oct 05)
- Re: mac is not unix [Re: What was that about hubris?] Gadi Evron (Oct 01)