funsec mailing list archives
Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review
From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:09:37 -0500
Oh, no doubt. But they will find it considerably more difficult to go up against people like Cox and de Raadt, who actually fix problems in a timely manner, rather than denying them in press releases and quietly releasing broken patches weeks or months or years later. We're getting off-track here, but your experience is, at best, many years out of date. And you might have noticed that even when problems are fixed in the kernel the fixes often don't make it out to distributions for a while. And by "Don't run Windows" you meant "Run some UNIX variant"? Not Mac? Plan 9? AmigaOS? Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larry_seltzer () ziffdavis com http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review, (continued)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Larry Seltzer (Nov 14)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review rick wesson (Nov 14)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Larry Seltzer (Nov 14)
- Message not available
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Larry Seltzer (Nov 14)
- Message not available
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Larry Seltzer (Nov 14)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Larry Seltzer (Nov 14)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Larry Seltzer (Nov 14)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Robert Graham (Nov 14)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review der Mouse (Nov 14)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Rich Kulawiec (Nov 15)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Larry Seltzer (Nov 15)
- Re: whitehouse cyber strategy review Rich Kulawiec (Nov 15)