Re: Rethinking FUNSEC

["Hubbard, Dan" <dhubbard () websense com>]

"This is not opening the list, this is taking these conversations"

Isn't the list open already? 



-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Barry Raveendran Greene
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:53 AM
To: funsec () linuxbox org
Subject: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC

Hi Team,

IMHO, the garbage in the press are influencing policy makers in governments
and corporations to the wrong conclusions. Conclusions which lead to actions
which is not addressing the reality of the threats. This is now not
something to be laughed at, but something which is hurting the industry.

I'm already started to tear into articles which as flawed, not researched,
and garbage. I will continue to do that. 

But we have another option - take the FUNSEC dialog public. This is not
opening the list, this is taking these conversations - which deal with
critiquing press articles -  public and searchable.

Thoughts?

Barry 






_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


 Protected by Websense Hosted Email Security -- www.websense.com 

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.