Re: Actual Climate Change Thread

[RandallM <randallm () fidmail com>]

> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
> From: chris () blask org
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Actual Climate Change Thread
> To: Martin Tomasek <tomasek () ufe cz>, funsec () linuxbox org
> Message-ID: <277118.71437.qm () web33807 mail mud yahoo com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> --- On Sat, 11/28/09, Martin Tomasek <tomasek () ufe cz> wrote:
>
> Ah, the hunt is engaged! :~)

> -best
>
> -chris

Chris,
I am trying to keep up here so I want to know if this summary is correct:

You feel Martin is arguing a "climate" specific area.
You argue it is "Global". But you are arguing or showing it to be a
cycle which has happen a number of times.
You feel Tomas is not bringing enough "man" causes to the table and
you feel man has added greatly along with natural causes.

am I near or far...or to keep this in debate perspective, "Cold or Hot"?

P.S. This is getting good! I do hope Martin will respond and that this
does not turn in to the flame throwing but civil debate.

-- 
been great, thanks
a.k.a System
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.