funsec mailing list archives
Re: Good, bad or indifferent?
From: phester <funsec () armorfirewall com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:01:56 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dave Dennis wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Thomas Raef wrote:Right. Is this sounding like "big-brother"?To me not in the least. Its sounding like finally at long last some sort of end to the wild west where any idiot can keep shooting his attacks anywhere he wants without accountability for his actions. But of course, thats not the only point of view, and many will agree it is big brotherism. Is it more important to allow open access to all, regardless of their malicious (unwitting, but come on) actions ?
"Malicious" is a state of mind. I haven't seen traffic analysis tools that can read minds. Are you advocating that my providers should shut off my connection every time I pen-test one of my other servers? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Good, bad or indifferent? Thomas Raef (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Benjamin Brown (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Dave Dennis (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Benjamin Brown (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Benjamin Brown (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Dave Dennis (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Benjamin Brown (Jan 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Thomas Raef (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Thomas Raef (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Dave Dennis (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? phester (Jan 25)
- Re: Good, bad or indifferent? Dave Dennis (Jan 25)