funsec mailing list archives

Re: Here We Go Again: Internet 'Drivers Licenses'


From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:33:55 -0800

Isn't that what the TPM was about? Didn't we all recognize that as a way
to make sure OSS couldn't run on hardware without paying MS or someone
in the ecosystem for signing the binary?



-----Original Message-----
From: rick wesson [mailto:rick () support-intelligence com]
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 8:37 PM
To: Tomas L. Byrnes
Cc: Paul Ferguson; funsec
Subject: Re: [funsec] Here We Go Again: Internet 'Drivers Licenses'

If you want to subvert the "internet drivers license" meme, insist
that
it is applications and hardware that should have the drivers license.

Inform that its not a people problem, but and identity problems around
applications and hardware.

Use the "drivers license" meme as it has momentum, just divert it from
people to software.

-rick


Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
Well, the alternative would be for Craig and his company to pay some
attention to the quality of their software, but that would cost some
serious money.

So, much more useful for them to divert attention from the genesis
of
the whole problem: their OS; and let governments clean it up, all
while,
naturally, making the barrier to entry for competitors to his
company
much higher.

As long as you understand that the senior execs of US Publicly
traded
companies parse Milton Friedman's famous dictum to suit their
personal
(lack of) morality:

The full dictum is (their referring to the shareholders): "That
responsi-bility is to conduct the business in accordance with their
desires, which generally will be to make as much money as possible
while
con-forming to the basic rules of the society, both those embodied
in
law and those embodied in ethical custom." Milton Friedman, New York
Times Magazine, September 13, 1970

http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-
soc-r
esp-business.html

Generally, they paraphrase that to be "maximize shareholder value",
sometimes "within the limits of the Law", by which they tend to mean
whatever you can get away with for a cost of lawsuit that is less
than
the cost of doing the right thing.

You will note that Friedman had a much broader view: that they
conform
to the basic rules of society " both those embodied in law and those
embodied in ethical custom."

However, you will find precious few captains of industry of the last
30
years operate on a principle more elevated than: "You'll be gone,
I'll
be gone, I got mine".

Craig Mundie is just an apologist for his Uncle Fester lookalike
boss:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/07/13/ballmer_is_fester_and_we/




-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-
bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Paul Ferguson
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:50 PM
To: funsec
Subject: [funsec] Here We Go Again: Internet 'Drivers Licenses'

The meme that seemingly will not die -- Craig Mundie, chief research
and
strategy officer for Microsoft, mentions it again:

http://rawstory.com/2010/01/agency-calls-global-cyberwarfare-treaty-
drivers
-license-web-users/

Enjoy!

- ferg




--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: