National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace

[Robert Slade <rmslade () shaw ca>]

There is no possible way this could potentially go wrong, right?

http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/ns_tic.pdf

Doesn't the phrase "Identity Ecosystem" make you feel all warm and "green"?

It's a public/private partnership, right?  So there is no possibility of some large corporation taking over the process 
and imposing *their* management ideas on it?  Like, say, trying to re-introduce the TCPI?

And there couldn't possibly be any problem that an identity management system is being run out of the US, which has no 
privacy legislation?

The fact that any PKI has to be complete, and locked down, couldn't affect the outcome, could it?

There isn't any possible need for anyone (who wasn't a vile criminal) to be anonymous, is there?

====================== 
rslade () computercrime org  slade () victoria tc ca  rslade () vcn bc ca
"If you do buy a computer, don't turn it on."     - Richards' 2nd Law
============= for back issues:
[Base URL] site http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev/
CISSP refs:     [Base URL]mnbksccd.htm
Security Dict.: [Base URL]secgloss.htm
Book reviews:   [Base URL]mnbk.htm
                [Base URL]review.htm
Partial/recent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/techbooks/
Review mailing list: send mail to techbooks-subscribe () egroups com
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
http://blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/slade/index.html http://twitter.com/rslade



_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.