funsec mailing list archives
Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft
From: der Mouse <mouse () rodents-montreal org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:24:41 -0500 (EST)
As much as I usually agree with rsk....
I've been told that I'm a terrorist because I think spamming should be criminalized and should carry the death penalty as a mandatory sentence. (Of course anyone claiming that they feel "threatened" by such a statement is publicly confessing that they're a spammer, but let's skip over that for now.)
Personally? I would feel threatened by it. Not because I'm a spammer, but because it is *way* too open to, well, we call them joe-jobs, but in traditional law it's called framing. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse () rodents-montreal org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 16)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Tomas L. Byrnes (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Joel Esler (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Paul Ferguson (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 18)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Nick FitzGerald (Nov 18)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 18)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Rich Kulawiec (Nov 22)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 22)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft der Mouse (Nov 22)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Tomas L. Byrnes (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Dan Kaminsky (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Dan Kaminsky (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Dan Kaminsky (Nov 17)
- Re: Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social Security Number is Not Identity Theft Jeffrey Walton (Nov 17)