funsec mailing list archives
Re: Firefox slow?
From: Joel Esler <joel.esler () me com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:03:39 -0500
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 07:58:31PM -0500, Larry Seltzer wrote:
Chrome has it's own security problems. (a lot of them). While I agreeit's a freaking fast browser, I'm still on Safari. Chrome is sandboxed. Very, very few of the vulnerabilities in it are exploitable in a meaningful way. In fact, the critical vulnerability they reported yesterday (http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2011/01/new_chrome_version_includes_ cr.php) is actually not exploitable because it's not in live code.
The sandbox is currently broken. I know people that can get out of it. For obvious reasons, I can't really disclose more than that.
I'd send you the list of critical vulnerabilities in Safari, but I'm afraid Verizon will start throttling my account for excessive bandwidth usage.
I understand that. They are essentially the same engine, if it affects Safari, it'll probably affect Chrome, but not necessarily vice versa. J _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Firefox slow?, (continued)
- Re: Firefox slow? Randal T. Rioux (Jan 13)
- Re: Firefox slow? Hubbard, Dan (Jan 13)
- Re: Firefox slow? RL Vaughn (Jan 13)
- Re: Firefox slow? Jeff Kell (Jan 13)
- Re: Firefox slow? der Mouse (Jan 14)
- Re: Firefox slow? Rich Kulawiec (Jan 14)
- Re: Firefox slow? Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Jan 13)
- Re: Firefox slow? Joel Esler (Jan 13)
- Re: Firefox slow? Larry Seltzer (Jan 13)
- Re: Firefox slow? Randy Abrams (Jan 13)
- Re: Firefox slow? Joel Esler (Jan 14)
- Re: Firefox slow? Larry Seltzer (Jan 14)