funsec mailing list archives
Re: Stratfor is Online
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:34:25 -0500
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:10:51PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
It seems more intuitive to me that the Stratfor shareholders would absorb the costs.
No, no, no. That's simply not how things are done in modern corporate America. First, costs must be passed on to customers. Second, shareholders must be pacified with dividends. (Oh...those costs have to be passed on as well. Good thing there are customers!) Finally: promotions and bonuses for management, as the company *must* retain the highly qualified and clearly irreplaceable people who've brought all this about. (Optional: if a fall guy is needed, find that geek in IT who was incessantly whining about poor site security. Clearly not someone who's "with the program", so fire his ass and let him take the blame.) ---rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Stratfor is Online Jeffrey Walton (Jan 16)
- Re: Stratfor is Online Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)
- Re: Stratfor is Online Jeffrey Walton (Jan 16)
- Re: Stratfor is Online Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)
- Re: Stratfor is Online Jeffrey Walton (Jan 16)
- Re: Stratfor is Online Chris Boyd (Jan 16)
- Re: Stratfor is Online Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: Stratfor is Online Jeffrey Walton (Jan 16)
- Re: Stratfor is Online Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)