Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: A question for the list...


From: Steve Barnet <barnet () chem wisc edu>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:53:05 -0500


 We're talking about (a pound of) cure, how about (an ounce of)
prevention?

  There seems to be consensus that (lack of) competence is part of the
problem.. If ISP's would/could take on more responsibility, the need for
hack-back would be greatly reduced, making discussion if it's nice or
not futile, so maybe the following is even on topic ;-)

[snip]

  I am aware that most ISP's are operating within tight budgets, I am
less aware of the impact of such a scheme on costs. 

Very nasty: N customers x M ports. Customer changes admins and becomes 
incompetent. Customer adds a platform and becomes incompetent. Customer 
adds an admin and becomes competent. ...

It won't scale at all well.
 

  One benefit for the ISP would be a reduced load on abuse@.. A benefit
for the customer would be reduced maintenance and clean-up costs. The
benefits for the community are obvious.

  What do you think ?

This sounds good in principle, but I think it would ultimately 
prove ineffective. There are the very obvious problems of 
determining competence (suppose the ISP is not competent) and 
resolving issues that are more social and organizational (and 
hence ultimately political).

However, even assuming all of the hairy judgment issues could be 
worked out, this would create a cost incentive to simply start 
tunneling every protocol through port 80 (or one arbitrary port). 
Given people's propensity to install arbitrary software from 
random anonymous sources:

From: support () microsoft com
Subject: Leet0 pr0xy 4 U
See my file!
-----Attachment
naughty.pif

I doubt it would take long to reconstruct the existing problem.

And given the history with egress filtering which also has 
obvious benefits for the community ...

Best,

---Steve




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies 
that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats. 
Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs.

To get your FREE white paper visit us at:    
http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: