Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Possible Intrusion Attempt?
From: "Thomas, Frank" <ThomasF () luton gov uk>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 09:41:11 +0100
I saw this on one of our machines the other day with a bit of spam - in a similar situation to yours. If you look at the HTML source of the spam message, my guess it that it's pulling an image down with a url like HTTP://username:password () some site com/foo/bar.gif let me guess, the details that appeared in the popped up authentication box would then match the username and password supplied in that URL... I think proxy gets confused with that format of URL and assumes that they are the details to authenticate with the proxy, as well as the site. IMHO, I don't think it's an attack HTH Frank -----Original Message----- From: Matt LaFelero [mailto:ramstryke () yahoo com] Sent: 22 May 2003 00:48 To: incidents () securityfocus com Subject: Possible Intrusion Attempt? I'm hoping someone here might be able to shed some light on this situation.. Some of my users have been getting some interesting spam mail. This is the first time I've ever seen a spam mail do this. When the user opens the spam mail, all of a sudden, an Internet Explorer authentication boxes pops up. You know those that ask for username, password, and domain. Well, I run MS Proxy 2.0 here and the logon with a 2KPro machine is integrated so the user never sees this box or has to enter his/her password to get on the Web. It's strange that this email triggers the authentication box. What's even weirder is that it populates the username for them, with weird names. The names always seem to change from spam mail to spam mail. I've seen iterations like fluff, skank, morton, taxiway.. you name it. It seems most of the emails are HTML, which can explain a lot. None of them had attachments. From what I could gather it seems to attempting to load a site. We run Outlook 2000 with SP3 and all hotfixes. My question is, how is this happening and is it a threat? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper *** Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats. Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs. To get your FREE white paper visit us at: http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- IMPORTANT: Luton Borough Council routinely monitors the content of e-mail sent and received by its e-mail systems, to ensure compliance with its policies and procedures. E-mails that contain encrypted material, program files, are obscene, inflammatory, criminal, offensive, in breach of copyright or contain a virus or threat to Council`s computer systems may be intercepted and/or deleted. Internet communications are not secure. The Council is not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been sent. This message is intended only for the addressee. Any unauthorised copying or distribution may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Luton Borough Council Town Hall Luton LU1 2BQ. Tel. (01582) 546000 or by using the reply option to this e-mail. Then delete this message from your system. Website: www.luton.gov.uk ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper *** Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats. Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs. To get your FREE white paper visit us at: http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt?, (continued)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Ryan Yagatich (May 23)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Gary Flynn (May 23)
- RE: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Jerry Shenk (May 23)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Anders Reed Mohn (May 23)
- RE: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Whiteside, Larry [contractor] (May 23)
- RE: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Rob Shein (May 25)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Andersson (no email) (May 26)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Thomas Zimmerman (May 26)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Lars Duesing (May 27)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Stewart (May 27)
- RE: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Rob Shein (May 25)
- RE: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Thomas, Frank (May 23)
- RE: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Whiteside, Larry [contractor] (May 25)
- RE: Possible Intrusion Attempt? FWAdmin (May 26)
- RE: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Brad Webb (May 27)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Matt LaFelero (May 27)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Keith Owens (May 28)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Jeff (May 29)
- Re: Possible Intrusion Attempt? Keith Owens (May 28)