Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: IP: The real bandwidth numbers.
From: David Farber <dfarber () earthlink net>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 07:51:21 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: Jordan Pollack <pollack () thinmail com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 06:54:38 To: beberg () mithral com ml to, farber () cis upenn edu ml to Subject: Re: IP: The real bandwidth numbers. That's really great data! I've always felt broadband can't arrive at $50/month cause it must lose so much money! Even flatrate dialup can be seen as a temporary win which externalized costs on the LEC who set up unlimited local calls never envisioning internet! In 99 I solved exactly this problem of flat rate isps getting overwhelmed with variable costs as email and filesharing keep growing. It cuts email costs by turning attachments into private urls: They become optional, download in binary rather than b64, and can be shared with simple text permissions rather than file shipping. Since email and bandwidth are bundled into the flat rate, we propose to turn storage into an unbundled metered service, sold by the byteyear and covering transfer costs. Jordan For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- IP: The real bandwidth numbers. Dave Farber (Apr 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IP: The real bandwidth numbers. David Farber (Apr 11)
- Re: IP: The real bandwidth numbers. David Farber (Apr 11)
- Re: IP: The real bandwidth numbers. David Farber (Apr 11)
- Re: IP: The real bandwidth numbers. David Farber (Apr 11)