Interesting People mailing list archives
more on What the WSIS argument (doesn't) mean
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:33:32 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Ronda Hauben <ronda () panix com> Date: October 4, 2005 12:39:20 PM EDT To: h_bray () globe com Cc: Ronda Hauben <ronda () panix com>, David Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: [IP] more on What the WSIS argument (doesn't) mean From h_bray () globe com
That sounds about right to me. It would be absurd for dissenting countries to set up their own Internet.
Is it any less absurd that the dissenting countries continuing to have the control over their Internet activity in the hands of a company formed under the charity laws of California, where the countries have no means of having any input into what is done by that company? The creation of "ICANN" is the problem, not the dissenting countries. ICANN is a problem that needs to be taken up before a catastrophe not after (like the problem of the flooding potential in New Orleans) Here's one of a number of reasons that were cited explaining the problem with ICANN. (See the article for others) The 3rd WSIS preparatory meeting for the Tunis Summit made a breakthrough in clarifying the nature of the problem of having one government exercise unilateral control over the administration of the infrastructure of the international Internet. As the UK/EU representative, David Hendon explained, ICANN is under "a contract from one government, and the government advises it what to do. It's kind of strange for governments to be advising a public sector body and for that body to be doing things for the whole world under the instruction of one government." [4]from: "Who Will Control Internet Infrastructure? At a recent U.N. preparatory meeting for the World Summit on Information Society, the dispute widens"
http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp? no=251118&rel_no=1
Ronda ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on What the WSIS argument (doesn't) mean David Farber (Oct 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on What the WSIS argument (doesn't) mean David Farber (Oct 14)