Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Justice sues Jersey to keep telcos quiet
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 18:38:16 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Tom Fairlie <tfairlie () frontiernet net> Date: June 17, 2006 12:39:48 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] Justice sues Jersey to keep telcos quiet Dave, It's relatively easy for large institutions (e.g., the federal government, big business) to get away with a lot of shady-- or even downright illegal--practices. After all, we live in a very busy world with countless distractions, and we have little time to study the myriad developments happening each and every day and determine which ones are suspicious. However, for people like me that study these developments intently, it's becoming unbearable to imagine the shear scope of what is currently happening in our country. More to the point, I don't like the quantity of government dealings that have been put under the protective umbrella of "national security". There has been a lot of debate over our national security state since 1947, but I want to focus on just the past few years. We have seen a growing number of questionable practices swept under the rug in order to protect "national security". My take on this is simply: who are they trying to kid? For example, who is even out to get us? The Chinese? Russians? Indonesia? Perhaps all of these countries would like us to lose some of our shine, but I don't think our current military establishment is overly worried about these threats (at least compared to the Cold War era). The only threat that Bush has even allowed to get onto our radar screen has been al Qaeda and company. So how, I ask, is talking about failures at the FBI (Cf. Sibel Edmonds) or telco tapping a risk to our security? How do these actions (i.e., the gagging of whistleblowers or the wire tapping of innocent Americans) enable, aid, or abet the terrorists in any way? After all, wouldn't the best way to protect our country be finding problems and fixing them (FBI, CIA) or maintaining our freedoms and liberties in the face of adversity? Instead, we get the powers that be taking the fifth and shutting everyone up? Exactly at what point will this reach a head? The only way to break this logjam is to vote for congresspersons that understand the problem and fight to fix it. Let's get going. Tom Fairlie One attempt at doing this here: http://www.nswbc.org/ National Security Whistleblowers Coalition ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Farber" <dave () farber net> To: <ip () v2 listbox com> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 6:55 PM Subject: [IP] Justice sues Jersey to keep telcos quiet Begin forwarded message: From: RJR PIA <RJR () PIAUSA org> Date: June 16, 2006 7:12:09 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Subject: Justice sues Jersey to keep telcos quiet For IP if you wish: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1035_22-6084665.html?tag=nl.e589 Justice sues Jersey to keep telcos quiet The U.S. government has sued the New Jersey Attorney General's office on grounds of security concerns to prevent it from asking telephone companies if they gave customer call records to the National Security Agency. Ronald J Riley, President Professional Inventors Alliance www.PIAUSA.org RJR"at"PIAUSA.org Change "at" to @ RJR Direct # (202) 318-1595 ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as tfairlie () frontiernet net To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ipArchives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Justice sues Jersey to keep telcos quiet David Farber (Jun 17)