more on Was the 2004 election stolen? No. | Salon.comNews

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Steven Hertzberg <stevenstevensteven () gmail com>
Date: June 3, 2006 9:02:15 PM EDT
To: dave () farber net
Cc: "'Randall'" <rvh40 () insightbb com>
Subject: RE: [IP] more on Was the 2004 election stolen? No. |  
Salon.comNews

> From: Steven Hertzberg <stevenstevensteven () gmail com>
>
> The results in Ohio and the Exit Poll have been thoroughly examined.

From: Randall [mailto:rvh40 () insightbb com]

Really?  How?  Edison/Mitofsky hasn't released the poll data, have they?
(If they have, Kathy Dopp of USCOUNTVOTES didn't know about it  
yesterday,
and she tends to keep up with this issue).

<SH> E/M released the Ohio exit poll data only to ESI so that we could
provide an independent analysis of the exit poll result, which we  
released
at a convention of statisticians in Miami in May 2005.  We were able to
obtain this data without compromising the privacy of the voter, which  
was
the issue preventing the release of the precinct level exit poll  
data, by
using a technique known as statistical blurring.  Kathy Dopp is aware of
ESI's report.

Steven



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/