Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: New Study Refutes Assumed Link Between Cell Phone Use and Auto Accidents
From: David Farber <dfarber () cs cmu edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:31:05 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Roman Gollent <roman-ip () gollent com> Date: August 21, 2007 10:04:03 AM EDT To: lauren () vortex com Cc: dfarber () cs cmu eduSubject: Re: [IP] New Study Refutes Assumed Link Between Cell Phone Use and Auto Accidents
Hi Lauren,While I respect your point of view (and thoroughly enjoy many of your contributions), my personal experiences contradict whatever studies you might cite. Of the 3 times that we've gotten rear-ended (two times while waiting for a red light and a third time while stationary in a traffic jam on I-90), all 3 incidents involved people who had been on their cell phones. Not people that had dozed off, not people paying attention to their kids, not people fixing their makeup, etc.
In my case it's not conventional wisdom but unfortunate reality that leads me to believe that it might make a difference. By that same token, and at the risk of making the strongly libertarian crowd roar, I wish that they would ticket
distracted drivers, period. Best Regards, Roman On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 07:50:23PM -0400, David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message: From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Date: August 20, 2007 7:25:28 PM EDT To: dfarber () cs cmu edu Cc: lauren () vortex com Subject: New Study Refutes Assumed Link Between Cell Phone Use and Auto Accidents New Study Refutes Assumed Link Between Cell Phone Use and Auto Accidents http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000271.html Dave, As regular readers of my missives may know, I've long been a critic of the conventional wisdom that the anti-cell phone laws becoming increasingly common (including one here in California set to take effect around a year from now) will reduce auto accidents -- the science and statistics just never appeared to be there to support the types of legislation passed, as far as I'm concerned. Now, a new U.C. Berkeley study appears to confirm that accident rates simply have not behaved in a way that would validate the views of those pushing these cell phone laws that affect the general population: http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2007/08/13_cellphone.shtml Laws passed on the basis of gut feelings, rather than hard facts, are often the ones that make the least sense and do the least good. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
------------------------------------------- Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- New Study Refutes Assumed Link Between Cell Phone Use and Auto Accidents David Farber (Aug 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New Study Refutes Assumed Link Between Cell Phone Use and Auto Accidents David Farber (Aug 21)
- Re: New Study Refutes Assumed Link Between Cell Phone Use and Auto Accidents David Farber (Aug 21)
- Re: New Study Refutes Assumed Link Between Cell Phone Use and Auto Accidents David Farber (Aug 21)
- Re: New Study Refutes Assumed Link Between Cell Phone Use and Auto Accidents David Farber (Aug 22)