Interesting People mailing list archives

Marketplace story on FCC and Comcast {for sure djf}


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:52:52 -0700


________________________________________
From: Tony Lauck [tlauck () madriver com]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 11:35 AM
To: David Farber
Subject: Re: [IP] Marketplace story on FCC and Comcast

Those of us who make, or have made, our living in networking are
fortunate that appetite has been unlimited.  I see no reason for this to
change so long as computers, storage and communications remain on
similar technology curves.  If it isn't P2P, it will be some other
application, for example off-site backup. (If moving bits over the net
were cheaper than driving hard drives across town, I would be moving
tens of gigabytes regularly.)

Networks need to be designed so that the load placed by heavy users
doesn't unduly impact the responsiveness seen by light users. This is an
engineering problem that has been recognized since the design of
time-sharing scheduling algorithms in the 1960's.

Of course it would be easy enough to remove communications from the
technology curve, making the situation worse.  Two ways come to mind:
monopoly and regulation. It would be a shame to get one as the result of
trying to avoid the other.


Tony Lauck
www.aglauck.com




David Farber wrote:
________________________________________
From: Dr. Lawrence Roberts [lroberts () anagran com]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 9:53 PM
To: Dan Lynch; David Farber; lroberts () anagran com
Subject: Re: [IP] Marketplace story on FCC and Comcast

Dan,
For those who want to watch a movie per day, downloading a 3 GB movie at 500 Kbps takes 13 hrs, about all you want to 
spend on it. However you also must in return send out 3 GB of your stored movies each day for the system to work. If 
5% of a University student body does this, a 20,000 student University would require 500 Mbps each way during the 13 
peak hours. So you see, it is easy to consume 1/2 Mbps per person. Is there a limit? Yes I would think so. 2-3 movies 
per day seem like the most one could consume. But some of these students use 5 Mbps continuously. So when I say 
unlimited appetite, I mean within the context of current average people usage which is much lower.

An Example:
If a University has 5000 students and 180 of them use 1/2 Mbps for the peak period then the average data rate over a 
100 Mbps Internet access will be 20 Kbps and each P2P user is using 25 flows. There will be another 500 average users 
trying to operate one flow at any moment and they also will get 20 Kbps. 90% of the capacity is going to P2P.
Larry


At 03:56 PM 7/13/2008, Dan Lynch wrote:
Larry, I don't doubt your measurements, but gee, are you saying that P2P has
an "unlimited" appetite?  As if there are an unlimited number of files to be
shared and the queue stretches to infinity?  Where is that demand coming
from?  I am imagining hordes of files out there that people are adding to
their Torrent lists as the pipes come slightly unclogged. Is that your model
of demand?

Dan

PS.  Too bad storage got so cheap! Else someone could be making more money
out of that!


On 7/13/08 2:28 PM, "David Farber" <dave () farber net> wrote:

________________________________________
From: Dr. Lawrence Roberts [lroberts () anagran com]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 3:08 PM
To: David Farber; Dr. Lawrence Roberts
Subject: RE: Marketplace story on FCC and Comcast

Dave,
Sure! I want people to start understanding the dynamics of the problem.
Please add me also if that,s ok so I can see comments.
Larry


At 02:44 AM 7/13/2008, David Farber wrote:
Can I repost to my IP list?

________________________________________
From: Dr. Lawrence Roberts [lroberts () anagran com]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 11:43 PM
Subject: RE: Marketplace story on FCC and Comcast

Jeff,
Like George, I agree the DSL and FTTX ISP's will not shift, but there is
another reason. The DSL companies have just as big or larger problem with P2P
since P2P expands to fill any capacity. In fact, as I have been testing and
modeling P2P I find it taking up even higher fractions of the capacity as the
total capacity expands. This is because each P2P app. can get more capacity
and it is designed to take all it can. In the Univerisities we have measured,
the P2P grows to between 95-98% of their Internet usage. It does this by
reducing the rate per flow lower and lower, which by virtue of the current
network design where all flows get equal capacity, drives the average rate per
flow for average users down to their rate. They then win by virtue of having
more flows, up to 1000 per user. I suspect they do not do this on cable since
the upstream capacity is only 10 Mbps and when it saturates, they must stop at
about 80%. But raise the capacity per user and the capacity of the upstream
choke point and watch out! P2P can consume virtually any capacity.
Larry




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com<http://www.listbox.com/>



Tel. 707-967-0203   Cell  650-776-7313
My assistant is Dori Kirk   Tel. 707-255-7094  dori () lynch com


Dr. Lawrence G. Roberts,  Ph:+1 650-906-8746,  W:  www.anagran.com<http://www.anagran.com/>, E:    lroberts () 
anagran com
Founder, Chairman, Chief Architect, Anagran, Inc., 580 Pastoria Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94085 USA
If not for you, please return. Any use other than the intended recipient is unauthorized.





-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


--
"Difficulties can never be greater than your capacity to solve them."
    - P. R. Sarkar

Anthony G. Lauck
PO Box 59
Warren, VT 05674
Southface 5 (for UPS and FedEX)
81 Park Ave
Warren, VT 05674
(802) 583-4405 (802) 329-2006 (FAX)




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: