Interesting People mailing list archives
Court weighs anti-terror law, free speech
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:54:05 -0500
Begin forwarded message:
From: bobr () bobrosenberg phoenix az us Date: February 24, 2010 3:46:22 AM EST To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: Court weighs anti-terror law, free speech
Dave Perhaps for I.P. IANAL, but I am confused.In 8th grade at Osborn school here in Phoenix, lo these many decades ago, Lloyd Wilhite taught us that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. He taughtus that the U.S. Code falls beneath the Constitution.My confusion arises from the accompanying headline, "Court weighs anti-terror law, free speech". If I was taught correctly, it seems to me that the Constitutionprevails. Can some lawyer(s) on I.P. set me straight? Thanks! Bob -- Bob Rosenberg P.O. Box 33023 Phoenix, AZ 85067-3023 Mobile: 602-206-2856 LandLine: 602-274-3012 bob () bobrosenberg phoenix az usThis message is hereby Creative Commons licensed: Attribution- NonCommercialCourt weighs anti-terror law, free speech 2 comments Feb. 24, 2010 12:00 AM McClatchy-Tribune http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2010/02/24/20100224scotus-terror0224.htmlWASHINGTON - The Supreme Court struggled Tuesday to resolve a conflict between the free-speech rights of a Los Angeles-based advocate for international peace and a broad anti-terrorism law that makes it a crime to advise a foreign terrorist group,even if it means advising its members to seek peace.The justices sounded closely split between those who saw this as a terrorism case and those who saw it as a free-speech case. A ruling in the case is expected in lateJune.U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan urged the court to uphold the broad sweep of the terrorism law and to permit prosecutions of anyone who gives any support to a terrorist group. She discounted the "supposed First Amendment claims" raised byhuman-rights advocates."When you help Hezbollah build homes, you're helping them build bombs," she said.But Georgetown law professor David Cole said the human-rights advocates he represents are not interested in supplying bombs, but rather in urging foreign groups to avoid violence and to take their disputes to the United Nations."They seek peaceful solutions to conflict. And they support only lawful activities," he said. Cole is representing the Humanitarian Law Project in Los Angeles and its president, Ralph Fertig, a University of Southern California professor who hasadvised the Kurds in Turkey.In 1997, the State Department listed the Kurdistan Workers Party as a foreign terrorist group, which meant Fertig could go to prison for giving "expert advice orassistance" to Kurdish leaders."The government has been arguing for more than a decade that our clients cannotadvocate for peace," Cole said.
------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Court weighs anti-terror law, free speech Dave Farber (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Court weighs anti-terror law, free speech Dave Farber (Feb 24)