Interesting People mailing list archives

policy based email delivery accept/decline ?


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:36:13 -0400





Begin forwarded message:

From: Doug Humphrey <doug () joss com>
Date: March 28, 2010 4:11:49 PM EDT
To: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: policy based email delivery accept/decline ?



for IP if you like

A question for a lot of smart people - is it reasonable to discuss a
set of "policy" flags on email headers which express the originators
sensitivity to certain practices exercised on emails?

As an example, I am on a number of email lists, small things, and
generally not at ALL what could be called "public".  When I send a
message to a list like this, I do NOT feel that I am publishing in any
"public" sort of way, and it is understood among the members of the
list that what is said on the list stays on the list.

Recently, a couple of the members of the lists have started using Gmail
accounts.  Since Gmail/Google has specific policies that allow it to
treat that information as its own, within a limited scope, it brings into questions the privacy policy of the list, and its ability to enforce it.

A simple answer is to ban the use of Gmail accounts from the list or to just tell people "if the Gmail thing bothers you don't send to the list" - but
while this would work in the simple immediate case, it doesn't scale
well, and there are larger questions.

MIGHT there be a technical means, with the sender stating "policy" on
what they accept and decline to have their message subjected to, and
the mail receiver stating their policy positions, and having delivery be able to be rejected in case of a mismatch in policy? Caller ID works a lot like this with the sender deciding to allow it or not, and the receiver being able to accept calls that have blocked ID or not as their policy dictates.

thanks,
doug





-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: