Do Women Want to be Oppressed?

["Dave Farber" <dave () farber net>]

 I know I’m going to get a lot of noise on this one djf

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: John Horgan <jhorgan () stevens edu>
Date: Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:41 AM
Subject: Do Women Want to be Oppressed?
To: Dave Farber <farber () gmail com>
CC: John Horgan <jhorgan () stevens edu>


Dave, I thought members of your list might find this column interesting.
John Horgan


Do Women Want to be Oppressed?: Evolutionary theorists claim that female
desire for domineering males helped create a patriarchal world.



In principle, evolutionary psychology, which seeks to understand our
behavior in light of the fact that we are products of natural selection,
can give us deep insights into ourselves. In practice, the field often
reinforces insidious prejudices. That was the theme of my recent column “Darwin
Was Sexist, and So Are Many Modern Scientists
<https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/darwin-was-sexist-and-so-are-many-modern-scientists/>
.”



The column provoked such intense pushback that I decided to write this
follow-up post. Alt-right pundit Steve Sailer described my column as “science
denialism
<http://www.unz.com/isteve/science-denialism-in-scientific-american/>.”
Psychologist Jordan Peterson deplored “the descent of *Scientific American*.
<https://www.facebook.com/drjordanpeterson/posts/1629724667091662>”*
Scientific American* columnist Michael Shermer called me the “PC police of
the [*Scientific American*] web site
<https://www.facebook.com/Michael.Brant.Shermer/posts/10154878902781386>.”



Political scientist Charles Murray complained
<https://twitter.com/charlesmurray/status/943599091740741632> that *Scientific
American* “has been adamantly PC since before PC was a thing,” which as
someone who began writing for the magazine in 1986 I take as a compliment.
Murray, famed for contending in *The Bell Curve* that biology underpins
racial inequality, has proposed similar arguments to explain female
inequality <http://www.aei.org/publication/where-are-the-female-einsteins/>.



Critics of my column see themselves as courageous defenders of scientific
truth, and yet they prefer “truth” that confirms their conviction that
biology underpins inequality. If you question these claims, you are a
“social justice warrior.” So what does that make them? Social *injustice*
warriors?...



Now let’s take a closer look at a claim advanced by evolutionary
psychologist Geoffrey Miller, whom I cited in my previous column. In his
2000 book *The Mating Mind*, Miller argues that sexual selection can
account for differences between males and females. Darwin proposed sexual
selection to explain puzzles like the tail of the peacock, which from a
practical point of view seems to diminish fitness. Darwin hypothesized that
females have chosen to mate with, or selected, peacocks with large tails,
thus propagating this trait. Miller suggests that sexual selection can help
explain why males dominate women in many realms of culture...


Continue reading at
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/do-women-want-to-be-oppressed/
​



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20171229115510:06170A76-ECB9-11E7-9A07-B2A5CA6CFF97
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com