Metasploit mailing list archives

Re: windows packages


From: Bahtiyar Bircan <bahtiyarb () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:25:02 +0300

Hi ,

I  newly subscribed to this list, so  missed previous discussions about
deploying msf as payload. sorry if repeting some questions..

Is there any way to improve  proxy ing  connections instead of deploying
metasploit and other tools to victim machine ?
First options that come in mind  are :
- SSH tunneling
- SSL  tunnelled  connections.
- Netcat/Cryptcat reverse connections
- OpenVPN  tunneled connection..

I dont know how , but in Core Impact  you can set newly deployed agent as a
source , and all connections are proxied through new agent.. This method
seems more efficient to me..

Bahtiyar


On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:46 PM, John Biondolillo
<johnb.electric () gmail com>wrote:

I've been playing around with Mubix's idea of the framework as a payload
and think its a great way of pivoting considering trying to route through a
meterpreter session doesn't allow for all the auxilary modules and 3rd party
tools (nmap). But what i've been doing is uploading a cab file of nmap with
the winpcap installer and what I would like to do is to be able to add my
3rd party tools to the framework install. I'm not that familar with NSIS and
I've been having trouble building my own custom installer, what i wanted to
know is if it would be possible if you could provide us with the nsi files
or post the scripts here so we can make our own custom framework packages so
we only have to use the deploymsf.rb for msf and nmap,etc.

Thank you for your great work


John

_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework


_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework

Current thread: