nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint NAP Status
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 1994 15:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
The use of ATM WANs to connect remote routers to ATM NAPs sounds like a good topic for another ATM NAP Workshop at the next IETF. -tjs
Perhaps this would better be a part of an IEPG meeting or NANOG meeting. Those are operations forums, where these types of things are the general topics of discussion. That aside, I'd second the call for an additional meeting. I'd like to see cisco present, to discuss the AIP and how it is expected to play in these markets. I'd also like to see someone from a relevent PUC attend and present some general views on tariffs for these types of services. I'd like to see presentations on sub-DS3 support and some additional discussion on media bridging techniques that have been proposed. A general report from the ATMF would be useful as well. In fact, I'd be willing to put up w/ the organization of something like this. --bill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Sprint NAP Status Farooq Hussain (Sep 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Tim Streater (Sep 23)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Farooq Hussain (Sep 23)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Ittai Hershman (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Pushpendra Mohta (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Tim Salo (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Paul Love (Sep 25)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Tim Salo (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Farooq Hussain (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Liang T. Wu (Sep 25)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Curtis Villamizar (Sep 27)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Elise Gerich (Sep 25)