nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint NAP Status
From: ltwu () faline bellcore com (Liang T. Wu)
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 1994 10:50:40 -0400
When we started last time trying to organize a NAP meeting, we quickly realized that RA will do a better job than Bellcore in coordinating among multiple (not necessarily communicating) awardees. Indeed, I am sure most people will agree they did a superb job in organizing the premeeting, the agenda, as well as the entertainment (whirlly ball?) Also our legal department was uneasy about us coordinating the meeting. So, I would like to sencond Farooq's suggestion. We like Bill's suggested topics. There are other issues such as RFC1323 performance issues that ANS may have something to say. We would be happy to help organize the meeting including supplying speakers, suggest vendor names, and help making phone calls, etc. Liang ----------
Current thread:
- Sprint NAP Status Farooq Hussain (Sep 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Tim Streater (Sep 23)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Farooq Hussain (Sep 23)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Ittai Hershman (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Pushpendra Mohta (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Tim Salo (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Paul Love (Sep 25)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Tim Salo (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Farooq Hussain (Sep 24)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Liang T. Wu (Sep 25)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Curtis Villamizar (Sep 27)
- Re: Sprint NAP Status Elise Gerich (Sep 25)