nanog mailing list archives

Re: Has PSI been assigned network 1?


From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis () ans net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 17:58:47 -0400


In message <Pine.BSD.3.91.950419000916.9764A-100000 () muffin wis com>, "Michael F
. Nittmann" writes:

Maybe we should make participation at a meet point subject to filing data 
to the route server, and peering should only go via route servers.

I'd settle for must register routes, although the latter would enforce
the requirement.  It seems to me to be very politically infeasible, so
not really worth further discussion.

flames?

Be carefull.  Bill might hug you.  :-)  Not really a flame, but what
you said was not really off the wall either, so none required.  :-)

Mike

Curtis


Current thread: