nanog mailing list archives
Re: US Domain -- County Delegations
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 15:12:34 -0700
(i hope that folks are noticing, appreciating, and planning to emulate my editing of the headers (i remove all recipients except "nanog"). the happy result is that each of you gets only one copy of each thing i submit. the unhappy alternative is that every time i reply to something on this thread, i end up getting two copies of all subsequent followups.)
How does this lighten the load on the root servers?
it means that .COM doesn't have to be a single zone. which in turn means that not all the root servers have to carry all the .COM delegations. it also makes BIND behave better but that's just an implementation issue and i could fix it in other ways (and will have to fix it in other ways.)
Current thread:
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations, (continued)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Walter O. Haas (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 02)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Randy Bush (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Ferguson (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Aug 02)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Aug 02)