nanog mailing list archives
Re: US Domain -- County Delegations
From: Paul Traina <pst () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 10:37:23 -0700
But there are two orthoganal problems here, and they should be treated separately. I know you understand this, but that doesn't seem to be the consensus of the group. (a) root DNS overloading (.com is big) (b) all the good names are taken As long as we can get people to understand there are two different problems here, we have a hope in hell of solving one or both. If people continue to lump them together, we are doomed.
Current thread:
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Walter O. Haas (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 02)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Ross Veach (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Randy Bush (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)