nanog mailing list archives
Re: root name servers
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 20:53:33 -0700
I think there may be a bit of confusion here. There is a plan to compress the root cache, making it appear to be a single, multi-homed machine.
Nope. Mr. IANA wanted it to appear to be different machines. We're just moving them all into a single domain and giving them short base names. This will result in nearly the same maximum number of root servers as your original proposal.
Current thread:
- Re: root name servers, (continued)
- Re: root name servers Michael Dillon (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Hans-Werner Braun (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Michael Dillon (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Bill Manning (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Paul A Vixie (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Paul A Vixie (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Paul Traina (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Bill Manning (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Peter Lothberg (Jul 29)
- Re: root name servers Bill Manning (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Paul A Vixie (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Mark Kosters (Jul 31)
- Re: root name servers Bill Manning (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Sean Doran (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Nathan Stratton (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Paul A Vixie (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Tim Salo (Jul 30)
- Re: root name servers Owen DeLong (Jul 30)