nanog mailing list archives
Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 10:10:06 -0400
Sean Doran writes:
Shall we table the motion ...Who's "we"? Sean.
Just what I've been wondering. This guy seems to think he's living in Robert's World(TM), where people have everyday conversations in the style (but not the substance) of Robert's Rules of Order, except the way he's doing it it comes out much more like Robert's Rules of Odor. Perry
Current thread:
- SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Tim Bass (Oct 16)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION bmanning (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Tim Bass (Oct 17)
- Why not NANOG.... Mike O'Dell (Oct 17)
- Re: Why not NANOG.... Jim Dixon (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Tim Bass (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION bmanning (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Perry E. Metzger (Oct 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Sean Doran (Oct 16)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Perry E. Metzger (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Cat Okita (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Patrick Horgan (Oct 17)