nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why not NANOG....
From: Jim Dixon <jdd () vbc net>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 14:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 17 Oct 1995, Mike O'Dell wrote:
Tim, My point is eluding you... Spam is in the mouth of the taster (to blast the Bard). We do not need consensus for *me* to view the continued barage of the NANOG list with this topic as a clear example of spamming.
Agreed absolutely. Take it to com-priv. -- Jim Dixon jdd () vbc net VP Engineering VBCnet West Inc 408 971 2682 fax 408 971 2684
Current thread:
- SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Tim Bass (Oct 16)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION bmanning (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Tim Bass (Oct 17)
- Why not NANOG.... Mike O'Dell (Oct 17)
- Re: Why not NANOG.... Jim Dixon (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Tim Bass (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION bmanning (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Perry E. Metzger (Oct 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Sean Doran (Oct 16)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Perry E. Metzger (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Cat Okita (Oct 17)
- Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION Patrick Horgan (Oct 17)