nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG
From: avg () postman ncube com (Vadim Antonov)
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 21:31:30 +0800
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Craig came down very hard on Bob Metcalfe and I was hoping that over the past few days someone would step in and explain that Bob is far from being a clueless journalist. I believe Craig is just showing how young he is.
On my part, when i was flaming B.M. i was perfectly aware of who he is. However, being an authority is not a guarantee of being right or being clueful about that particular subject. I happened to learn that hard way.
Bob Metcalfe along with David Boggs published in ACM (July 1976) an article entitled "Ethernet - Distributed Packet Switching for Local Computer Networks". This paper was the groundwork for Ethernet - without which we would still be using X.25 and possibly no LANs.
That is an exaggregation. BTW, Ethernet has little to do with X.25's obsolescense.
Having Bob (as well as a few other heavyweights) on this list, we can only come to a better understanding of the routing, addressing and portability problems of the Internet that we are all hitting.
Hm.
Craig, Bob has probably forgotten more than you and I will ever know.
I find the attitude of reverence to authorities a bit out of place in any scientific or engineering society trying to be something more than a country club. --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG, (continued)
- Re: NANOG David ``Joel Katz'' Schwartz (Apr 03)
- RE: NANOG Jeff Ogden (Apr 03)
- RE: NANOG Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- RE: NANOG Vadim Antonov (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG Bob Metcalfe (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG Hank Nussbacher (Apr 06)
- Re: Bob Metcalfe Edward Henigin (Apr 06)
- RE: NANOG Jim Fleming (Apr 06)
- Re: NANOG Vadim Antonov (Apr 06)
- Re: NANOG Craig A. Huegen (Apr 06)
- Re: NANOG Hank Nussbacher (Apr 07)