nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG
From: "Craig A. Huegen" <c-huegen () quad quadrunner com>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 22:48:16 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 6 Apr 1996, Vadim Antonov wrote:
Hank Nussbacher wrote:Craig came down very hard on Bob Metcalfe and I was hoping that over the past few days someone would step in and explain that Bob is far from being a clueless journalist. I believe Craig is just showing how young he is.On my part, when i was flaming B.M. i was perfectly aware of who he is. However, being an authority is not a guarantee of being right or being clueful about that particular subject.
I strongly concur. Even though I am young, I still have studied a lot of networking history. I knew who Bob Metcalfe was. However, his InfoWorld article had some points which just made him look like a complete newbie to this arena. He didn't do research, and therefore looked like a Web-Magazine-of-the-Month editor, using buzzwords and appearing to have no clue of what was really going on. Take it as you please, --Craig
Current thread:
- RE: NANOG, (continued)
- RE: NANOG Jeff Ogden (Apr 03)
- RE: NANOG Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- RE: NANOG Vadim Antonov (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG Bob Metcalfe (Apr 04)
- Re: NANOG Hank Nussbacher (Apr 06)
- Re: Bob Metcalfe Edward Henigin (Apr 06)
- RE: NANOG Jim Fleming (Apr 06)
- Re: NANOG Vadim Antonov (Apr 06)
- Re: NANOG Craig A. Huegen (Apr 06)
- Re: NANOG Hank Nussbacher (Apr 07)
- RE: NANOG Jeff Ogden (Apr 03)