nanog mailing list archives

Re: the Internet Backbone


From: Nathan Stratton <nathan () netrail net>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 19:22:52 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 8 Apr 1996, David ``Joel Katz'' Schwartz wrote:

On Mon, 8 Apr 1996, Avi Freedman wrote:

Now, many 2nd level providers that *could* operate default-free choose
not to.  Even if you have three or more sets of 30k+ routes each, it
takes balls to risk dropping packets that your customers want you to
deliver just so that you can have the packet be dropped at your router
instead of at your (possibly backup) transit provider's router.

Avi

      Can't anyone who takes full routes from any tier 1 provider
operate without a default route? And isn't it a reasonable assumption

Yes

that if you don't have a route somewhere, odds are they don't have a
route to you (assuming you do your own BGP routing) and so a default

Yes/No

route is mostly pointless anyway?

Ok, why look through 30K routes instad of just sending all packets out the
default.


      What am I missing?

A lot.

Nathan Stratton           CEO, NetRail, Inc.    Tracking the future today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone   (703)524-4800                          NetRail, Inc.
Fax     (703)534-5033                          2007 N. 15 St. Suite 5
Email   sales () netrail net                      Arlington, Va. 22201
WWW     http://www.netrail.net/                Access: (703) 524-4802 guest
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own."               Matthew 6:34




Current thread: