nanog mailing list archives
Re: Agenda for next NANOG
From: Michael Dillon <michael () memra com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 21:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 30 Aug 1996, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
Any of the ISPs losing packets like crazy need only look at the stats on their routers.
Maybe these ISP's don't know that there are stats on their routers or that there is packet loss there. As an NSP you would be doing your customers a service by telling them about such things. It doesn't help to call these people clueless idiots and suggest that they have no business running an ISP even if it is true. And even if an ISP monitors their router stats and sees peak traffic at around 60% of a T1 they could still have congestion problems elsewhere in their network such as their Ethernet or lines to POP's. All of this stuff contributes to public perceptions of a slow Internet and somebody has to take the first step to do end-to-end testing and point out where these trouble spots really are. Michael Dillon - ISP & Internet Consulting Memra Software Inc. - Fax: +1-604-546-3049 http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael () memra com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG, (continued)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Alan Hannan (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Vince Fuller (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Havard . Eidnes (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Stan Barber (Aug 30)
- RE: Agenda for next NANOG Jim Browning (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Steve Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Michael Dillon (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Tim Salo (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Michael Dillon (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Vern Paxson (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Paul Ferguson (Aug 31)