nanog mailing list archives
Re: Agenda for next NANOG
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 13:29:08 -0400
At 01:11 PM 8/30/96 PDT, Randy Bush wrote:
Analysis of Actual End to End Performance accross the NAPs/MAEsAn excellent topic, to be sure, but how do you propose that this be measured?And there's a subject for a NANOG panel in itself. I can think of some interesting experiments that would involve cooperation of multiple peers. But there are folk far better based in measurment than I who might suggest some fun stuff. Guy, Steve, ..., this is your cue. randy
... And it might even be nice for someone who is active in the IETF Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) to participate. [ref: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/bmwg-charter.html] - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG, (continued)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Stan Barber (Aug 30)
- RE: Agenda for next NANOG Jim Browning (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Steve Schnell, Sprint Corporation (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Michael Dillon (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Tim Salo (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Michael Dillon (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Curtis Villamizar (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Vern Paxson (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: Agenda for next NANOG Paul Ferguson (Aug 31)