nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd)
From: "Walter O. Haas" <haas () xmission com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 11:34:56 -0700
Creating a consortium [akin to the NAP model] of small ISP's could easily resolve this problem, if all address space allocated to each ISP was contiguous and could be aggregated to a larger prefix.But, this would require working with your direct competition in your local geographic area. Ain't gonna happen. No way, No How.
Why not? We already have competing TV stations sharing an antenna site, and competing newspapers sharing a printing press and distribution mechanism. I don't see why ISPs couldn't do something similar where it's in everybody's interest. -- Walt
Current thread:
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd), (continued)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Michael Dillon (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Paul Ferguson (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Jon Zeeff (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Dorian Kim (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) elliot (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Jon Zeeff (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Paul Ferguson (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) bmanning (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Paul Ferguson (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Kai (Feb 13)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Sean Donelan (Feb 17)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Walter O. Haas (Feb 20)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Scott Mace (Feb 20)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Dave Siegel (Feb 21)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Ehud Gavron (Feb 21)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Paul A Vixie (Feb 22)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Scott Mace (Feb 21)
- Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd) Scott Mace (Feb 20)