nanog mailing list archives
Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming
From: Tony Li <tli () jnx com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 10:19:24 -0800 (PST)
The first time I heard this idea was last year, from Noel Chiappa. Joel Halpern and I spent a while discussing it and decided it would scale surprisingly well. However, why would the major providers be motivated to implement it at all? Because it reduces routes... and it has other benefits, such as allowing subscribers to change providers within the provider group without renumbering. If you still have a copy of Yakov's ID on stratum based aggregation, you might check that out. Sorry, it's expired and I don't have a copy myself. Yakov and I are discussing overhauling the document and resubmitting it. Tony - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Alexis Rosen (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Alexandre Leib Grojsgold (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Wayne Bouchard (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming coneill (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Alexis Rosen (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Scott W Brim (Oct 30)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Tony Li (Oct 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Peter Cole (Oct 30)
- RE: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Vadim Antonov (Oct 30)