nanog mailing list archives
Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming
From: coneill () oneill net
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 14:23:54 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 29 Oct 1996, Wayne Bouchard wrote:
It's dead simple, really: Assign address blocks to pairs of providers. Both providers announce those blocks all the time, and assign addresses out of those blocks to customers who multihome between those two providers.Subscriber A gets netblock from B who cooperates with C. Subscriber A hates C and goes with D. What now? D has to advertize the route and C has to stop. There goes the simplicity.
No. The block is not PI space. Subscriber A must renumber if he switches to another provider. The block will still be advertised as the aggregate w/o any holes. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Alexis Rosen (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Alexandre Leib Grojsgold (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Wayne Bouchard (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming coneill (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Alexis Rosen (Oct 29)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Scott W Brim (Oct 30)
- Re: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Tony Li (Oct 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Peter Cole (Oct 30)
- RE: A proposal for reducing routes due to multihoming Vadim Antonov (Oct 30)