nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]
From: "Chris A. Icide" <chris () nap net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 21:17:31 -0600
At 09:39 PM 10/30/96 -0800, Andy lague wrote:
Do not carry a full routing table on your exchange point router. Only carry routes to your customers and to networks with which you peer at that particular exchange point.
Sorry, but I'm about 50 mails behind in this thread, so I may repeat something someone may have suggested, but I'll give it a shot in case someone hasn't said this. Might there be a way Cisco (ahem, the router vendor) could add an IP or MAC based inbound (or outbound) filter on the next hop? If so, I could maintain a filter that matches my peers. This would not prevent my peers from pointing default at me, but would prevent non-peers from doing so. Chris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy], (continued)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Jonathan Heiliger (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Paul Ferguson (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Andy lague (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Tony Li (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Alex.Bligh (Oct 31)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Chris A. Icide (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Tony Li (Oct 30)