nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]
From: Tony Li <tli () jnx com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 23:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Might there be a way Cisco (ahem, the router vendor) could add an IP or MAC based inbound (or outbound) filter on the next hop? If so, I could maintain a filter that matches my peers. This would not prevent my peers from pointing default at me, but would prevent non-peers from doing so. I actually looked at doing this. It turns out that it's non-trivial to implement, would have serious performance repercussions, is most likely ISP-specific, and is only applicable while the interconnect remains a shared media. Given this, the fact that there are bigger fish to fry, and my belief that FDDI's days are numbered in interconnect applications, I recommended against it. Tony - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy], (continued)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Jonathan Heiliger (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Paul Ferguson (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Andy lague (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Tony Li (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Alex.Bligh (Oct 31)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Chris A. Icide (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Tony Li (Oct 30)