Re: Creating exchanges [Was: Re: MAE-East - 30%]

[Barry Raveendran Greene <barry () singnet com sg>]

Hello Robert,

Robert E. Seastrom wrote:

> Hong Kong looks slightly promising except for the slight problem of
> next summer.  Singapore is probably a no-go because of how anal the
> government is there; all we need is an AP CIX with a host government
> enforced AUP that says "no dirty gifs, no politically unacceptable
> speech, etc.".

Actually, when you count the number of countries directly interconnected at any Asia Pacific IX (including the ones on 
the US West Cost) STIX - Singapore Telecom Internet Exchange is currently #1. (see http://www.stix.net). 

Singapore's SBA (the Internet censor) has stated over and over again that business and international traffic are NOT 
their problem. They just out to protect the people at home - and that's Singapore's really none of our business (and 
not a topic for NANOG). Please read the information from the source vs reading biased reporters from the US - 
http://www.gov.sg/sba. 

As to you other point, AP CIX is a no go in Asia Pacific. This discussion as been going on for over 4 years. I've been 
involved and actively trying to make it happen for over 3 years. The cable consortium, telco, national, AP ISP and US 
ISP politics prevent any type of successful 'neutral' IX in Asia Pacific. 

Barry




--
Barry Raveendran Greene             |       ||        ||        |
Senior Consulting Engineering       |       ||        ||        |
Singapore                           |      ||||      ||||       |
tel: +65 738-5535 ext 235           |  ..:||||||:..:||||||:..   |
e-mail: bgreene () cisco com           |  c i s c o S y s t e m s  |

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -