nanog mailing list archives
Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations
From: jakob () jubii dk (Jakob Faarvang)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 14:42:43 GMT
On Sun, 27 Oct 1996 11:11:10 +0000, you wrote:
I don't think this is correct. Ebone peers with other pan-european networks of comparable size, IBM, BT and EUnet comes to my mind.In fact, last time I heard, EBONE and EUnet's peering policy bore an uncanny resemblence to those of Sprint & MCI (albeit bandwidth scaled).
From Ebone's own pages, BT is listed as a customer to Ebone, and it is said the IBM and EUnet have transit agreements with Ebone. I can't find any direct text stating Ebone's peering policies, but on the Amsterdam IX page (http://www.ams-ix.net/) the following is said: Policy: Does generally not peer except with other larger ISPs after negotions. Become a member and we'll peer with you! - Jakob Faarvang - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Peter Lothberg (Oct 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Peter Lothberg (Oct 27)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider Avi Freedman (Oct 27)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Peter Lothberg (Oct 27)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Alex.Bligh (Oct 27)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Jakob Faarvang (Oct 27)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Alex.Bligh (Oct 27)
- Re: Provider credibility - does it matter? was Re: Inter-provider relations Peter Lothberg (Oct 27)