nanog mailing list archives
Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave?
From: Gordon Cook <cook () netaxs com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 11:14:30 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 27 Oct 1996, Paul A Vixie wrote:
I think this would be a bad thing. NS needs a watchdog.
Cook: I think I agree. It would leave NSI in defacto control of a valuable resource. As far as I know, other than through the NSF co-operative agreement, NSI has no contractual or legal obligations to the Internet community?? Would it be pulling the plug of stability at the very time when others are trying to launch competing mechanisms? Could or should ISOC step in if NSF vacates these shoes? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Should NSF declare victory and leave? William Allen Simpson (Oct 27)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Paul A Vixie (Oct 27)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Gordon Cook (Oct 27)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Robert Mathews-ICICX (Oct 27)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 29)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Avi Freedman (Oct 29)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Gordon Cook (Oct 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Scott Bradner (Oct 27)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? William Allen Simpson (Oct 29)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Michael Dillon (Oct 29)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? David R. Conrad (Oct 29)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Michael Dillon (Oct 29)
- Re: Should NSF declare victory and leave? Paul A Vixie (Oct 27)